Friday, December 05, 2025

Coney Island Won the Battle — But the Story Isn’t Over: A Full Breakdown of the Casino Fight


Coney Island has always survived big dreams, bad plans, and brutal attempts to reshape it. From the fires that toppled the great amusement palaces to decades of failed redevelopment schemes, this place endures because people fight for it.

This year, that spirit showed itself again.

After nearly three years of debate, proposals, rallies, hearings, lobbying, and community pushback, the plan to build a massive casino and luxury hotel complex inside the historic amusement district has officially been defeated. On September 29th, Coney Island’s Community Advisory Committee (CAC) voted 4–2 against advancing the casino plan known as “The Coney.” Weeks later, the state selected three casino sites elsewhere in NYC—none of them in Brooklyn.

But while the casino project is dead, the larger fight for the soul of Coney Island continues.

This article offers a clear, thorough, and deeply informed summary of everything that happened—from the original proposal to the final vote—and what it means for the future of New York’s most iconic seaside amusement district.



The Proposal That Sparked a Firestorm

In late 2022, Thor Equities—joined by Saratoga Casino Holdings, the Chickasaw Nation, and Legends Hospitality—announced its plan for a $3+ billion casino resort on Surf Avenue. The project included:

  • A 30+ story luxury hotel
  • Casino gaming floors
  • A 2,500-seat concert venue
  • Convention and retail space
  • A massive footprint that would have required demapping public streets
  • A location inside the heart of the amusement district, just steps from the Wonder Wheel

Developers framed the project as an “economic engine” that would transform Coney Island into a year-round destination.

But longtime residents, historians, amusement business owners, and preservation advocates saw something very different:

A towering development that would overshadow, privatize, and permanently alter the fragile character of America’s Playground.


The Community Fights Back

From the beginning, opposition was strong and well-organized.

Local Groups That Took the Lead

  • Coney Island USA
  • Save Coney Island veterans
  • Neighborhood activists and small business owners
  • Amusement operators
  • The grassroots group No Casino in Coney Island
  • Longtime residents who understood that a casino was fundamentally incompatible with the beachfront amusement core

These groups consistently highlighted:

  • Thor Equities’ long history of demolitions, empty lots, and stalled development
  • The risk of year-round traffic chaos in an area already strained
  • The danger of placing a casino in a community with high poverty and limited social services
  • The threat to public streets, sunlight, air, and the open feel of the amusement district
  • The precedent that such a mega-structure would set for future oversized development

Their message was simple and powerful:
Coney Island deserves investment—but not at the cost of its identity.


Community Board 13 Says “No”

In January 2025, Community Board 13 voted against the land-use changes needed for the casino project. Though advisory, this vote mattered.

It gave local elected officials political cover. It signaled that people who live and work in Coney Island do not want a casino consuming the amusement zone. And it reinforced a message to the state:
This project does not have local support.


The State Steps In: The CAC Hearings

Under New York’s casino laws, each proposed site must be reviewed by a Community Advisory Committee (CAC)—a six-person panel representing local and state officials. A project must receive at least four votes in favor to move forward.

Through the summer of 2025, the CAC held hearings where:

  • Union groups and paid supporters spoke in favor
  • Residents, amusement workers, and preservation advocates spoke against
  • Experts warned about environmental and traffic impacts
  • Questions about electrical load, emergency response capacity, and parking gridlock went unanswered

One CAC member famously criticized the environmental study as a blueprint for “traffic hell.”



The Vote That Ended the Casino Bid

On September 29, 2025, the Coney Island CAC cast its decisive vote:

YES:

  • Governor’s appointee
  • Mayor’s appointee

NO:

  • State Senator’s appointee
  • Assemblymember’s appointee
  • Brooklyn Borough President
  • Councilmember Justin Brannan

Final: 4–2 Against

This legally ended the project.
It could not advance to the state’s Gaming Facility Location Board.
Coney Island’s bid was officially dead.

That night, Coney Island USA held a creative “funeral” for the casino—a celebration of local power and community victory.


December 2025: State Confirms Three Casino Sites (None in Brooklyn)

On December 1, 2025, the state announced the three downstate casino locations:

  • Resorts World Aqueduct (Queens)
  • Hard Rock Metropolitan Park at Citi Field (Queens)
  • Bally’s Ferry Point (Bronx)

Coney Island was not—and could not be—among them.

This sealed the outcome:
The amusement district has been saved from the casino threat in this licensing round.


Why This Was Such an Important Win

A victory like this has bigger meaning than just defeating a development proposal.

It proves:

  • Coney Island still has a soul worth protecting.
  • Community voices can overpower deep pockets.
  • The amusement district is not just real estate—it’s heritage, culture, history, and identity.

A casino would have introduced a privatized, towering fortress into one of the last remaining free-and-open amusement corridors in the country. It would have cast literal and symbolic shadows over the Wonder Wheel, Deno’s, the Boardwalk, and the small businesses that shape Coney Island’s character.

This was not NIMBYism.
It was cultural preservation, plain and simple.


But Is the Fight Over? Not Completely.

This casino proposal is dead, but the dynamics behind it still exist:

  • Thor Equities still holds valuable land and still has development ambitions.
  • The amusement district remains vulnerable to oversized, mismatched proposals.
  • The future of Surf Avenue and Neptune Avenue is still unwritten.
  • Another casino licensing round could happen years from now.

That’s why continued reporting, transparency, and community involvement matter.

This victory is a pause—an important one—not the end of the story.


Conclusion: A Moment to Celebrate—and Stay Vigilant

Coney Island won the battle.
The amusement district stands safe—for now.
The Wonder Wheel will not be dwarfed.
The Boardwalk will not be shadowed by a 30-story tower.
And the fantasy, freedom, and weirdness that make Coney Island magical survive another day.

But Coney Island’s story has always been about tension: between commerce and creativity, between big plans and fragile traditions, between real estate and real joy.


SOURCES

πŸ”— Key Sources (with links) on the Coney Island Casino Debate

Source What it Covers / Why It’s Important
Spectrum News NY1 — “Coney Island casino bid voted down by Community Advisory Committee” (Sep 29, 2025) (NY1) Reports on the 4-2 CAC vote that rejected “The Coney,” effectively ending the bid.
Brooklyn Paper — “Committee officially rejects proposed Coney Island casino” (Sep 29, 2025) (Brooklyn Paper) Confirms the CAC’s decision and includes local reactions.
NY1 — “Councilman Brannan to vote no on Coney Island casino proposal” (Sep 26, 2025) (NY1) Public statement from an elected official explaining why he opposed the casino — useful for quoting local political opposition.
CBS New York — “3 casinos are coming to downstate New York” (Oct 14, 2025) (CBS News) Context for the broader downstate casino licensing process and confirmation that Coney Island’s bid is not among the winners.
New York State Gaming Facility Location Board (Official site) — “Applicants” page listing all proposals for downstate licenses (2025) (Gaming Facility Location Board) Primary official registry of all casino proposals, including “The Coney.” Good for documentation / verification.
City & State New York — “Breaking down every 2025 New York casino license bid” (Feb 10, 2025) (City & State New York) Overview of all the bids, including “The Coney,” their proposed sites, and how the process works — useful for background context.
FOX 5 New York — “What is the current status of each NYC casino proposal?” (Sep 29, 2025) (FOX 5 New York) Snapshot of where the major NYC casino proposals stood right after the CAC decisions.
CasinoBeats / CDC Gaming Reports — “Remaining three NYC casino bidders submit supplemental applications” (Oct 15, 2025) (CasinoBeats) Shows how the rest of the city-wide process continued — useful for showing that Coney Island was definitively excluded.
No Casino in Coney Island / Coney Island USA’s info page — “Say No to the Coney Island Casino” petition page (2025) (Coney Island USA) Community-driven resource documenting grassroots opposition, petitions, and local organizing — helpful to show community voice and activism.

πŸ“š Additional Context & Industry-Wide Sources

  • Casino.org — “MGM Empire City, Resorts World and Hard Rock Will Likely Win New York Licenses” (Sep 23, 2025) (Casino.org)

  • CoverS / Covers.com — “Three remaining NYC casino candidates make final pitch” (Oct 17, 2025) (Covers.com)

  • Yogonet — “New York casino race narrows to four finalists as state board weighs bids” (Oct 13, 2025) (Yogonet)

These don’t focus specifically on Coney Island — but they help place “The Coney” bid within the larger context of NYC’s 2025 casino licensing round.


No comments: