KINETIC CARNIVAL - The Coney Island Blog

A space of musings, past and current as well as the future of amusements in the legendary Coney Island and Beyond!

Thursday, June 18, 2009

The City Is Ignoring The Public Outcry

After rallies at the steps of City Hall, visiting the planning commission office, outcries over the internet, recommendations by Community Board 13 and Borough Pres. Marty Markowitz, warnings by the NY Times and claims and requests by the Municipal Arts Society and ‘Save Coney Island’, the city’s planning commission along with the CIDC have completely ignored the pleas.

The City’s Planning Commission was urged to vote yesterday to approve the Mayor’s plan which calls for high-rises and chain retail within the 60 acres of Coney’s current amusement zone. Those 60 acres of amusements have already shrunken since Coney’s hey-day. The city’s early plan, which consisted of about 27 open-air amusements, was later revised without consensus from its board, resulting in Coney Island USA creative director, Dick Zigun to part with them. The revised plan diminished the amusement area to an insulting mere 9 acres.

Now the plan has moved from the community, through the Borough President office, and on to the City Planning Commission, which apparently voted yes on it without any consideration whatsoever to advocates for a vital Coney Island.

In a
press release yesterday by ‘Save Coney Island’:

“This plan spells disaster for Coney Island. In refusing to make urgently needed revisions to its Coney Island rezoning plan, the City threatens the very future of a world-renowned amusement destination,” said Juan Rivero, spokesman for Save Coney Island. “The City continues to defy calls from the community and amusement experts to fix its plan.”

Pro-amusement advocates who want a thriving and vital Coney Island is strongly urging the city to take notice and fix its plan.

'Save Coney Island recommends:

If it fixes its current rezoning plan, the City can revitalize Coney Island’s historic amusement district — and preserve it as a beloved New York playground, a world-class tourist destination, and an economic engine for the neighborhood and the city as a whole.

To create that win-win situation, Save Coney Island recommends the following:
- Expand the acreage for outdoor rides and amusements. Twelve acres, as proposed by the City’s plan, is not enough. At a minimum, the land between the Boardwalk and the Bowery should be reserved for open-air amusements.

- Keep high-rises out of the heart of the amusement district. Move the proposed hotel towers north of Surf or west of Keyspan Park.

- The rezoning should include a greater mix of maximum footprints to encourage a more diverse and desirable mix of businesses, and to protect local entrepreneurs.

The public would hugely approve the city’s plan if it only changed this part of it. They cannot undermine the need for a thriving amusement space. Don’t talk about hotels anywhere in Coney Island if you give tourists and the public a miniature amusement area. There will be no need to stay more than a couple of hours to see everything. You don’t see a hotel next to Kings Plaza. The plan has to reverse the change to diminish the open-air amusements and expand the most vital ingredient in Coney’s revitalization process: the amusements. We hope the city will be responsible enough to answer to this most appropriate needed change in the Mayor's plan.

According to the ULURP (
Uniform Land Use Review Procedure) process, the plan will next move to the City Counsel for review and hearing. Afterwards it probably make its way to the state where it may not be handled with kiddie gloves.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Omar Robau @ 6/18/2009 10:20:00 AM 


Blogger MUSCLE13 said...

There was a big demonstration yesterday for more and better paying year round jobs and more affordable housing in Coney.

The Coney community is asking for a better plan with bigger retail (CB13) recommendation.

We should here some better news at the City Council over the summer especially after the State Legislature doesn't move on Parkland by this Monday's deadline.

After almost half a century the Govt is finally take the necessary steps in Coney and finally listening to the community. This won't be just a 3 month a year destination anymore. We are closer to ending the winter Ghost Town.

June 18, 2009 at 1:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Freak, your man Sitt still doesnt get what he wanted, so why do you constantly spout the same nonsense?

your not the community, you dont speak for the community, your nothing but a disgruntle Sheapshead Bay resident who finished destroying his own neighborhood, and moving on to another.

June 19, 2009 at 9:04 PM  
Blogger Bruce said...

everyone wants amusements still, except for you and sitt.. minority of nothing.

June 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM  
Blogger MUSCLE13 said...

After this Monday, Coney is one step away - City Council and Domenic in July/August

This has always hinged on the Parkland issue, and after Monday's State deadline it's clear sailing.

The Winter Ghost Town is ending.

June 20, 2009 at 12:36 PM  
Blogger Bruce said...

Monster, parkland issue means nothing to you or Sitt. Coney Island will still not have residential, which Sitt cries he needs. You know why you are against Parkland? Parkland gives a extra layer of protection, to prevent Sitt from getting his residential zoning. Residential rezoning is the death of the amusement district. The only ghost town is in your mind, which everyone has proved you wrong about over and over again.

June 20, 2009 at 6:30 PM  
Blogger MUSCLE13 said...

I don't think my last comment through. This article speaks for itself

You guys have just misread the state of Coney Change from the beginning. It was imperative for the community and business wise it was inevitable and way overdue. The process has been long but true to the year round intentions of the original CIDC mission statement in 2003. You guys floundered on the tangents. Big mistake. I've seen it a million times.

June 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM  
Blogger Bruce said...

There you go again, misquoting, doesnt surprise me. here is the full quote :

Develop year-round businesses to strengthen the Coney Island economy and encourage the development and retention of existing businesses

who are those existing businsses that you want to be shutdown that the CIDC statement wants to keep?

June 21, 2009 at 10:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

and you are a plain nut from the CI board who knows nothing. doesnt live here. has no comprehension of what coney needs, just cares about that he hates to travel out to starret city to eat, after closing down all your local places to build condos that sit empty. which is why you want a red lobster where the cyclone is.

June 22, 2009 at 1:06 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home