The City’s Planning Commission was urged to vote yesterday to approve the Mayor’s plan which calls for high-rises and chain retail within the 60 acres of Coney’s current amusement zone. Those 60 acres of amusements have already shrunken since Coney’s hey-day. The city’s early plan, which consisted of about 27 open-air amusements, was later revised without consensus from its board, resulting in Coney Island USA creative director, Dick Zigun to part with them. The revised plan diminished the amusement area to an insulting mere 9 acres.
Now the plan has moved from the community, through the Borough President office, and on to the City Planning Commission, which apparently voted yes on it without any consideration whatsoever to advocates for a vital Coney Island.
In a press release yesterday by ‘Save Coney Island’:
“This plan spells disaster for Coney Island. In refusing to make urgently needed revisions to its Coney Island rezoning plan, the City threatens the very future of a world-renowned amusement destination,” said Juan Rivero, spokesman for Save Coney Island. “The City continues to defy calls from the community and amusement experts to fix its plan.”
'Save Coney Island recommends:
If it fixes its current rezoning plan, the City can revitalize Coney Island’s historic amusement district — and preserve it as a beloved New York playground, a world-class tourist destination, and an economic engine for the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
To create that win-win situation, Save Coney Island recommends the following:
- Expand the acreage for outdoor rides and amusements. Twelve acres, as proposed by the City’s plan, is not enough. At a minimum, the land between the Boardwalk and the Bowery should be reserved for open-air amusements.
- Keep high-rises out of the heart of the amusement district. Move the proposed hotel towers north of Surf or west of Keyspan Park.
- The rezoning should include a greater mix of maximum footprints to encourage a more diverse and desirable mix of businesses, and to protect local entrepreneurs.
According to the ULURP (Uniform Land Use Review Procedure) process, the plan will next move to the City Counsel for review and hearing. Afterwards it probably make its way to the state where it may not be handled with kiddie gloves.
8 comments:
There was a big demonstration yesterday for more and better paying year round jobs and more affordable housing in Coney.
The Coney community is asking for a better plan with bigger retail (CB13) recommendation.
We should here some better news at the City Council over the summer especially after the State Legislature doesn't move on Parkland by this Monday's deadline.
After almost half a century the Govt is finally take the necessary steps in Coney and finally listening to the community. This won't be just a 3 month a year destination anymore. We are closer to ending the winter Ghost Town.
Freak, your man Sitt still doesnt get what he wanted, so why do you constantly spout the same nonsense?
your not the community, you dont speak for the community, your nothing but a disgruntle Sheapshead Bay resident who finished destroying his own neighborhood, and moving on to another.
everyone wants amusements still, except for you and sitt.. minority of nothing.
After this Monday, Coney is one step away - City Council and Domenic in July/August
This has always hinged on the Parkland issue, and after Monday's State deadline it's clear sailing.
The Winter Ghost Town is ending.
Monster, parkland issue means nothing to you or Sitt. Coney Island will still not have residential, which Sitt cries he needs. You know why you are against Parkland? Parkland gives a extra layer of protection, to prevent Sitt from getting his residential zoning. Residential rezoning is the death of the amusement district. The only ghost town is in your mind, which everyone has proved you wrong about over and over again.
I don't think my last comment through. This article speaks for itself
http://coneyrocks.blogspot.com/2009/06/coney-politicians-speak.html
You guys have just misread the state of Coney Change from the beginning. It was imperative for the community and business wise it was inevitable and way overdue. The process has been long but true to the year round intentions of the original CIDC mission statement in 2003. You guys floundered on the tangents. Big mistake. I've seen it a million times.
There you go again, misquoting, doesnt surprise me. here is the full quote :
Develop year-round businesses to strengthen the Coney Island economy and encourage the development and retention of existing businesses
who are those existing businsses that you want to be shutdown that the CIDC statement wants to keep?
and you are a plain nut from the CI board who knows nothing. doesnt live here. has no comprehension of what coney needs, just cares about that he hates to travel out to starret city to eat, after closing down all your local places to build condos that sit empty. which is why you want a red lobster where the cyclone is.
Post a Comment